The Journal of Arts and Communication (JAC) employs a double-blind peer review system to ensure the highest level of objectivity and academic integrity. Under this system, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers remain strictly anonymous throughout the entire process.

Reviewer Guidelines & Responsibilities

Upon receiving a manuscript from the Editorial Board, reviewers are expected to:

  • Expert Evaluation: Assess the work based on their specific area of expertise and the manuscript’s contribution to the field.
  • Transparency & Neutrality: Maintain a transparent, unbiased, and constructive approach. Any potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed immediately.
  • Timely Feedback: Provide a formal recommendation to the Editorial Office within one week of accepting the review invitation.
  • Confidentiality: Treat all manuscripts as confidential documents. The content must not be shared or cited until official publication.

Editorial Decision Making

Reviewers provide one of the following recommendations to the Editorial Office:

  1. Acceptance: The manuscript is ready for publication.
  2. Revision Required: The author must address specific concerns (minor or major) before further consideration.
  3. Rejection: The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards or scope.

Final Authority: While the peer review process informs the outcome, the Editor-in-Chief holds the final authority regarding the acceptance or rejection of any manuscript. Any internal conflicts or appeals regarding the review process will be mediated by the Chief Editor to ensure a fair resolution.

Submit Your Manuscript

Authors may submit their original research directly to our editorial team:

  • Primary: jmcravish@gmail.com
  • Official: editor@jacresearch.in.net